Legal Opinion

Falk v. Kimmerle

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This case was decided by the court En.Banc. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Escambia County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, J.

This is an action of assumpsit instituted by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error, the declaration containing two counts, one in the sum of $257.21, with interest, for goods bargained and sold by the plaintiffs to the defendants, and the other for a like sum for money found to be due from the defendants to the plaintiffs “on accounts stated between them,” the damages being laid at $500.00. The plea filed by the defendants was “that they never were indebted as alleged except in the sum of $198.43.” The case was submitted to a jury upon the issues as made by the pleadings and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beal v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Coker v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1878
  4. Schley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. Anthony v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  2. McKinnon v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Romano v. PalazzoSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API