Legal Opinion

Cornell v. Central Electric Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit, upon a promise to pay.' Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

The appellee, a corporation, sued the appellant for $737.42, claimed for electric supplies furnished by it to one Hand, who had contracted with appellant to place electric wires, fixtures and devices in a hotel building then in process of construction by the appellant, and, upon the verdict of a jury, a judgment for the full amount claimed was recovered by appellee.

■ The appellant contends that the alleged promise by him or his agent to pay the debt of Hand to appellee was not sustained by a preponderance of the evidence. The evidence upon that question was conflicting. It is the very essence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clifford v. LuhringIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Borchsenius v. CanutsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pool v. DockerIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Wilson v. BevansIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Honeyman v. JarvisIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gregory v. ArmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Kee v. CahillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Weisse v. FowlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API