Legal Opinion
Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1993No. CC A8512-08127, A8803-01216; CA A62648; SC S38606PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*503TONGUE, retired Justice, pro tempore
The question presented for decision in this case is whether the owner of a large shopping center, such as the Lloyd Center, may be required by the provisions of either Article IV, section 1 (initiative and referendum), or Article I, section 8 (free speech), of the Oregon Constitution to allow persons to seek signatures on initiative petitions in the common areas of the shopping center.
We hold that persons seeking signatures on initiative petitions in the common areas of the Lloyd Center have a constitutional right to do so under Article IV, section 1, of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Las VegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Empresas Puertorriqueñas de Desarrollo, Inc. v. Hermandad Independiente de Empleados TelefónicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2000
- State v. CiancanelliOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- New Jersey Coalition Against War in the Middle East v. J.M.B. Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.