Legal Opinion

Safeco Insurance v. Lovely Agency

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1985No. 84-305PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Defendants Lovely Agency and Donald McHenry appeal from the judgment of the Gallatin County District Court, awarding Safeco Insurance Company (Safeco) prejudgment interest, and from the court’s order requiring a supersedeas bond in an amount covering the judgment and prejudgment interest. We affirm.

The issues are:

1. Is the plaintiff entitled to prejudgment interest?

2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion by requiring a supersedeas bond in an amount large enough to cover the entire judgment including prejudgment interest?

Safeco settled a claim against its insured, Leonard Doran, by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Pacific Plywood, Inc. v. Access Road Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Carriger v. BallengerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Price Building Service, Inc. v. HolmsMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Agrilease, Inc. v. GrayMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Safeco Insurance v. Lovely AgencyMontana Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. James Talcott Construction, Inc. v. P&D Land EnterprisesMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Palmer Ex Rel. Diacon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Swank Enterprises, Inc. v. All Purpose Services, Ltd.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Dew v. DowerMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API