Legal Opinion

Safeco Insurance v. Lovely Agency

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1982No. 81-361PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell

In a damage action by an insurer against its agents for wrongfully issuing an insurance policy, the District Court of Gallatin County entered judgment for the agents. The insurer appeals. We reverse, holding the insurer is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability and remanding for trial on the issue of damages.

Safeco initially brought an action against insureds, Leonard Doran, Paul Doran, Lovely Agency and McHenry to have a policy of farm liability insurance called ab initio because of misrepresentations in Doran’s application for insurance. Safeco later learned that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. VetterAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Forster v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holm-Sutherland Co., Inc. v. Town of ShelbyMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Erler v. Creative Finance & Investments, L.L.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Safeco Insurance v. Lovely AgencyMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Daniels v. DeanMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Shupak v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API