Legal Opinion

James Talcott Construction, Inc. v. P&D Land Enterprises

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2006No. 05-103PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Plaintiff James Talcott Construction (Talcott) and Defendant P&D Land Enterprises (P&D) entered into a contract under which Talcott would construct condominiums on Whitefish Lake in Whitefish, Montana. Problems, delays and disputes arose leading Talcott to sue P&D in the Eleventh Judicial District Court seeking to foreclose on a construction lien and for certain costs. P&D counterclaimed for breach of contract. The District Court appointed a special master to hear the case. The District Court subsequently adopted, with some modifications, the Special Master’s findings of fact and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Plath v. SchonrockMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. First Security Bank of Bozeman v. TholkesMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Renville v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Price Building Service, Inc. v. HolmsMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Fiedler v. FiedlerMontana Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Blue Ridge Homes, Inc. v. TheinMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Textana, Inc. v. Klabzuba Oil & GasMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Johnston v. PalmerMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. West v. Club at Spanish Peaks, L.L.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dimarzio v. Crazy Mountain Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API