Legal Opinion
Holson v. Gosnell
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 19, 1975No. 20042PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
This case involves the single question of the existence of venue in an action in which one of the defendants is a national bank. The First State National Bank is established in Aiken County, and it operates a branch in Saluda County. This suit was instituted in Saluda County and is based upon allegedly fraudulent sales of securities, some of which were sold in Saluda County. The parties have agreed in the Statement of the case that “this is a transitory action not involving transactions of the Saluda branch office of Defendant bank.”
Unquestionably, the Court of Common Pleas of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Michigan National Bank v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Levin v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
- Central Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. BougasSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Connecticut National Bank v. IaconoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Merrimack Valley National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. CarruthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Southland Mobile Homes of South Carolina, Inc. v. Associates Financial Services Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.