First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. Carruth
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Petitioner, defendant in a lawsuit pending in Pima County Superior Court, seeks review of the respondent court’s denial of its motion for change of venue. Since venue rulings are appropriately reviewable by special action, McKinney v. Superior Court, 19 Ariz.App. 566, 509 P.2d 638 (1973), we assume jurisdiction.
Real party in interest, plaintiff in the pending lawsuit, alleged inter alia that the defendant was a national banking association engaged in banking business in Arizona and that its conduct towards her constituted discriminatory employment practices within the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Buffum v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Odette v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Northside Iron and Metal Company, Inc. v. Dobson and Johnson, Inc., and the Third National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- National Bank of North America v. Associates of Obstetrics & Female Surgery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Cloud v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Fall River County v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Kaiser Aetna v. DealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Austin v. CrystalTech Web HostingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- PLM Tax Certificate Program 1991-92 v. Denton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.