Legal Opinion
Home Savings of America v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 16, 2002No. 92-620CPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending in this Wmsior-related1 ease are plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority, defendant’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss Counts II Through IV of Home’s Complaint, and defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Home’s Theory of the Cost of Replacement. Oral argument was held on December 21, 2001. For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ motion is granted, defendant’s motion to dismiss counts II, III, and IV is granted, and its motion for summary judgment with respect to count I is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are Home Savings of America, F.S.B.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Home Savings of America, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.