Legal Opinion
Farrin v. Maine School Administrative District No. 59
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 10, 2001No. CIV. 01-43-B-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SINGAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Russell Farrin and Barbara Farrin, on behalf of their son Jacob Far-rin, appeal a hearing officer’s Special Education Due Process Hearing Decision issued pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (the “IDEA” or the “Act”), and the Special Education provisions of the Maine Revised Statutes, 20-A M.R.S.A. § 7001 et seq. (the “Maine Statutes”). Pursuant to the Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stated below, the Court AFFIRMS the hearing officer’s decision.
I. OVERVIEW…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Daniel Lenn, Etc. v. Portland School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Christopher B. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alex R., a Minor, by and Through Beth R., and Beth R., His Mother and Next Friend v. Forrestville Valley Community Unit School District 221Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Patrick v. Success Acad. Charter Sch., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Fitzgerald v. Fairfax County School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Dohmen Ex Rel. Dohmen v. Twin Rivers Public Sch.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2002
- Lamoine School Committee v. MS Z. Ex Rel. N.S.District Court, D. Maine · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.