State v. Peters
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 126,016 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DEIZMOND C. PETERS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Where no argument or evidence is offered to show the prosecutor's reason for exercising the peremptory strikes were pretext for discrimination, a defendant fails to meet his or her burden under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S. Ct. 1712,
90 L. Ed. 2d 69
(1986). 2. Application of the invited error doctrine in the context of jury instructions turns on whether the instruction would have been given—or omitted—but for an affirmative request to the court…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Alvarado-MerazSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- State v. SublettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.