Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Wachowski
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 27, 2006No. CV 03-2873 MMM (VBKx)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING THE TERMINATOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THE MATRIX DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sophia Stewart alleges that defendants Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, James Cameron and Gale Anne Hurd (collectively, the “Terminator Defendants”) willfully infringed her copyrighted literary works by making and distributing The Terminator (“Terminator 1”), Terminator 2: Judgment Day (“Terminator 2”) and Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (“Terminator 3”). 1 Stewart similarly alleges that defendants Warner Bros.…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gable v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Briggs v. BlomkampDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Kaseberg v. Conaco, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Dept. of Transp. and Dev. v. Kition ShippingDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2009
- Stabile v. Paul Smith Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.