Legal Opinion
Briggs v. Blomkamp
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 3, 2014No. C 13-4679 PJHPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge
The parties’ motions for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on September 3, 2014. Plaintiff Steve Wilson Briggs appeared in propria persona, and defendants Neill Blomkamp, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., Tristar Pictures, Inc., Media Rights Capital II, L.P., and QED International LLC appeared by their counsel Michael J. Kump and Gregory P. Korn. Having reviewed the papers and other materials submitted by the parties, and having carefully considered their arguments and the relevant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shame on You Productions, Inc. v. Elizabeth BanksDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Stabile v. Paul Smith Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Alfred v. Walt Disney Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Ambrosetti v. Oregon Catholic PressDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Ambrosetti v. Oregon Catholic PressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.