Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Home Trust Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an action in conversion. The facts shown are that plaintiff is a resident of Westport, a part of the City of Kansas City, and defendant is a corporation engaged in the banking business in Kansas City, Mo.

In February, 1922, one Curtis M. Amos, purchased a garage from Ernest Aug'ustine, and in payment therefor Amos and his wife, Margaret, executed their promissory note in the sum of $1329, dated February 14, 1922, payable in monthly installments of $150 each, beginning August 15, 1922, with six per cent interest on the unpaid balance. In order to make the deal, Sir. Augustine had to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. BowenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Lipscomb v. TalbottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Boeka v. NuellaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. Pulitzer Publishing Co. v. McNicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. First National Bank v. StamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schulte v. FlorianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. ZahnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Jordan v. EbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Bonuso v. Shroyer Loan & Finance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API