Boeka v. Nuella
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Louis Laio Commissioner’s Court. The promissory note upon which this suit is founded is negotiable.
1Opinion of the CourtRichaRdson, Judge
The only question of law discussed in the briefs is whether the holder of a promissory note, who acquired it for a valuable consideration, can maintain an action upon it in his own name without an endorsement or a written assignment.
A party claiming to be the owner of a note transferred merely by delivery has only an equitable title to it; and, before the practice act of 1849 was adopted, he could not in *181such a case maintain an action on it in his own name, but was compelled to bring suit in the name of the payee to his use, after a bill in equity. But by the law as it now stands there is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Billings v. JaneNew York Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by24 opinions
- Chapman v. McIlwrathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
- Lipscomb v. TalbottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Spears v. BondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Davis v. SittigTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Younker ex rel. Ralston v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.