State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Zahn

MANFORD, Judge.

This appeal follows a jury award for damages in condemnation proceedings. The judgment is affirmed.

*187Points of error presented, in summary, allege the trial court erred because it (1) permitted counsel to commence argument before instructing the jury; (2) sustained respondent’s motion in limine the morning of trial, thus giving respondent an unfair advantage; and (3) sustained respondent’s motion in limine, thus excluding evidence as to damages suffered by appellants due to change of access.

These proceedings arose from the acquisition of land for Route 240 in Saline County. The…