Legal Opinion

Bonuso v. Shroyer Loan & Finance Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1944No. 185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Judgment was entered against the maker of a promissory note payable to the order of “Shroyer Loan and Finance Company, Inc.” The note was produced, proven and admitted in evidence. It contained no endorsement. On cross-examination of plaintiffs president he admitted that the payee named in the note was a Delaware corporation, and that plaintiff was a Maryland corporation of the same name. There was no evidence of a transfer of the note by the payee to plaintiff.

Without evidence of consolidation or merger of the two companies, we must assume that the Maryland…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Richardson v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Meuer v. . Phenix National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Big Builders, Inc. v. IsraelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Kelly Adjustment Co. v. BoydDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Kelly Adjustment Co. v. BoydDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API