Legal Opinion
Zevalkink v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided June 2, 1994No. 91-1683PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. MANKIN, Judge, concurred in the result.
STEINBERG, Judge:
The appellant, widow of World War II veteran James B. Zevalkink, appealed pro se from a June 10, 1991, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) denying her claim for accrued benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 6121(a). Ophel H. Zevalkink, BVA 91-19719 (June 10, 1991). The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) filed a motion for summary affirmance. Because this case presents legal issues of first impression, single-judge summary disposition is not appropriate. See Frankel v.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Fenderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Vda de Landicho v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Zevalkink v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Robinette v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Smith v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.