Legal Opinion
McGhan v. F. C. Hayer Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 25, 1949No. Civil Action No. 2973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
This action arises out of alleged antitrust law violations. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. Plaintiffs seek damages and an injunction. Defendant Capitol Records, Inc., has moved for a dismissal as to itself, alleging (1) wrong venue and (2) lack of proper service. The second part of the motion was abandoned at the hearing of the motion, however, so the venue question is the only issue now before the Court. Section 15 of 15 U.S.C.A. provides that any person who has been injured by violations of the antitrust laws may sue for such injuries “ * * * in any district court of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoover Group, Inc. v. Custom Metalcraft, Inc., and Dwayne HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Pierce v. Perlite Aggregates, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1952
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cook Group Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- Caine v. Anchor Petroleum Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961