Legal Opinion

Special Indemnity Fund v. Richardson

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 1996No. 87301PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*533MEMORANDUM OPINION

ADAMS, Vice Chief Judge.

This review proceeding presents one legal issue for our consideration — the proper interpretation to be given 85 O.S.Supp.1993 § 171. Essentially, the question is: did the amendment of § 171 by the Legislature in 1993 effect a change in the definition of a physically impaired person?1

The Workers’ Compensation trial court found Claimant Tex Danny Richardson sustained 24.4 per cent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole from an employment-related low back injury sustained on July 6, 1994. The court also determined Claimant had a 35 per cent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Special Indemnity Fund of the Oklahoma v. TylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miville v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Lee v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  5. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API