Miville v. Special Indemnity Fund
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JOPLIN, Judge:
¶ 1 Petitioner Roland Miville (Claimant) seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his claim for benefits against Respondent Special Indemnity Fund (Fund). In this proceeding, Claimant asserts misapplication of law by the trial court. Finding the trial court’s order free of legal error, however, we hold the order of the trial court should be sustained.
¶2 Claimant sustained an on-the-job injury in August 1991. On August 25, 1995, the Workers’ Compensation Court found Claimant, as a result of the 1991 injury, thirty percent (30%) permanently partially disabled over and above…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Phillips v. HA Marr Grocery CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Special Indemnity Fund v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lee v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017