MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. MACKEY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
Wyrick, J.,
with whom Combs, C.J., and Winchester, J., join, dissenting:
¶ 1 It should go without saying that when the Legislature changed the definition of “physically impaired person,” it changed the definition of “physically impaired person.” In the English language, provisos (i.e., clauses beginning with the words “provided that ...”) place a condition or limitation on the immediately preceding text;1 So when the Legislature added a proviso to the end of its definition of “physically impaired person,” it intended to place a new condition or limitation on how it had previously defined…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marty v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Special Indemnity Fund of the Oklahoma v. TylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Special Indemnity Fund v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- In Re Frary's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.