Legal Opinion

Lee v. Special Indemnity Fund

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1998No. 90,300PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARL B. JONES, Vice Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this cause, the claim of Petitioner/Claimant, James D. Lee, against the Special Indemnity Fund was denied by the trial judge and that determination is here for review. Claimant’s last injury was to the right shoulder and neck and was joint-petitioned as a 36% injury to the body as a whole. The trial judge determined that jurisdiction did not exist to proceed against the Fund, and the claim was denied. As grounds for reversal, Claimant reasons that it was error for the trial court to find that it did not have jurisdiction to proceed with its claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davidson v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. BedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garvin v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API