Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hathaway v. Hart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1985No. CC D8201-66193; CA A24959; SC S31364PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The issue in this case is whether, under Oregon statutes and the Oregon Constitution, the defendant is entitled to a jury trial in a criminal contempt proceeding for violation of a restraining order entered pursuant to the Abuse Prevention Act, ORS 107.700 to 107.720.

We allowed review to consider this issue in light of State ex rel Dwyer v. Dwyer, 299 Or 108,698 P2d 957 (1985). In Dwyer, we held that a defendant charged with criminal contempt for failing to pay court-ordered child support was not entitled to a jury trial. We based our holding on “the historical fact that when the constitution…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Nearing v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. SpadaOregon Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. M. K. F. v. MiramontesOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Mikkelsen v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In re C.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Szalai v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API