Legal Opinion
In re C.W.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 27, 1999No. 98-557PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
M.C., mother of the juvenile C.W, appeals from a protective order of the Rutland Family Court. She contends the court: (1) abused its discretion and violated her constitutional right to travel by excluding her from the Town of Poultney; and (2) exceeded its authority in providing for enforcement of the balance of the order by criminal contempt. We amend the protective order and, as amended, affirm it.
The minor, C.W, was seven years old at the time of these proceedings and had been in the custody of the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) since November 1996. In March 1997,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Russell v. ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. HosierWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Sheehan v. RyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- State v. StellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Obolensky v. TrombleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.