Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. City of Stanfield

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2011No. CV060246; A141066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Plaintiffs filed two claims for relief against defendant, stating separate claims for overcharges for water and sewer services. The trial court entered a judgment awarding $3,823.50, plus prejudgment interest, for the water services overcharge claim and $5,688.00, plus prejudgment interest, for the sewer services overcharge claim. The court then entered a supplemental judgment denying plaintiffs’ attorney fees request under ORS 20.082 (2005), amended by Oregon Laws 2009, chapter 487, section 5, a statute that allows prevailing party attorney fees “on any claim based on contract” if the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Gaona v. BLACKETTEROregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rivera-Martinez v. VuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Bowerman v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Coast 2 Coast Logistics v. Badger AuctioneersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Protect Grand Island Farms v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API