Legal Opinion

Rivera-Martinez v. Vu

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 8, 2011No. 080913379; A144371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Plaintiff, who pursued and prevailed on a minimum wage claim against his former employers and a legal malpractice claim against his former attorneys, appeals a judgment that denied him attorney fees against the lawyer defendants, Donald N. Hooton and Hooton Wold & Okrent, LLP. Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in denying him attorney fees against the lawyer defendants, because his legal malpractice claim arose from their negligence in handling an overtime wage claim against plaintiffs former employers and prevailing party attorney fees are statutorily authorized on overtime wage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Domingo v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Glamann v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fitzgerald v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ridenour v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. O'Malley Bros. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Mathis v. St. Helens Auto Ctr., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Ivers v. SalladayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Rowlett v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API