State v. Holcomb
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a conviction on one count of possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine). ORS 475.992(4)(b). She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence, asserting that the evidence was obtained as the result of an unlawful stop. We review for errors of law, State v. Sopiwnik, 176 Or App 127, 129, 30 P3d 430 (2001), and agree with defendant that the stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
The following facts are undisputed. Early in the afternoon of May 11, 2002, Corporal Bill Bradbum of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. EhretCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. JacobusOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SopiwnikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HighleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. FriasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.