Legal Opinion
State v. Jacobus
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1993No. CC C88-10-38136; CA A61294; SC S38216PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
Defendant was charged with unlawful possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992. Before trial, he moved to suppress the state’s evidence on the ground that he had been stopped and searched unlawfully. The trial court denied the motion. Thereafter, the trial court found defendant guilty and entered a judgment of conviction. On defendant’s appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Jacobus, 106 Or App 496, 809 P2d 108 (1991). We allowed defendant’s petition for review and also affirm, but on different grounds.
We summarize the facts from uncontradicted testimony. About 9 p.m. on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Maciel-FigueroaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BackstrandOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.