Legal Opinion

State v. Frias

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 2009No. 06FE0541SF, A133906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine. ORS 475.894. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop that was extended without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. We reverse and remand.

We state the facts consistently with the trial court’s explicit and implicit findings. State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 74-75, 854 P2d 421 (1993); Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487, 443 P2d 621 (1968). At…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. EhretCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. KentoppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. Espinoza-BarraganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API