Foulds v. King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Helen E. Foulds and others, as executors, etc-.,, of George B. Finch, deceased, from a decree of the -Surrogate’s Court of the county of Warren, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 3.1st day of May, 1901, judicially settling the accounts of the temporary administrators of the estate of George B. Finch, deceased.
1Opinion of the Court
Sewell, J.:
The appeal is from' that part of the decree determining the amount of commissions and the allowance to the counsel for the temporary administrators.
It is urged -that the temporary administrators were not entitled to the commissions allowed.
*355First. Upon the value of certain shares of stock which were not taken into their possession.
Second. Upon a book account due to the decedent.
Third. Upon the value of 100 shares of stock bequeathed to John Anderson, Jr., and Albert Uewcombe, which were claimed to be specific legacies. '
The appellants contend that commissions should, have been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- President, Directors & Co. of Mechanics' Bank v. New-York & New Haven RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Holt v. JexNew York Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re LowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1928
- In re the Intermediate Judicial Settlement of the Account of KeaneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
- Pruyn v. SearsNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- In re the Estate of ViggianiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- Will of Blomdahl v. ErlandsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.