Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Viggiani
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 20, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The principal question in this accounting proceeding involves the allowance of commissions to the temporary adminis*75trators. It is contended on behalf of the objectants that because the testator in his will directed the executors to serve “ without compensation, statutory or otherwise,” they should be denied commissions in their capacity as temporary administrators. The contention is overruled. The research of counsel and of the surrogate has failed to reveal any reported decision on the question.
Upon application made to my colleague, Mr. Surrogate Delehanty, two temporary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WorthingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Foulds v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of HurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of RunkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- In re the Estate of WorchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of MottekNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Estate of EllmersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- Higbee v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- In re the Accounting of WoodNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.