Will of Blomdahl v. Erlandson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed November 6, 1934:
Fairchild, J.
To give full force to a last will and testament and prevent the making of a new will for the testatrix by a court, rules based on human experience and sanctioned by human wisdom have been adopted to aid in an interpretation of a will when its meaning is called in question. The most familiar of these rules are applicable in this case: (a) The words of the will are to' be construed to give effect to the intention of the testator, (b) The intent must be drawn from the will, (c) When the language of the testatrix is plain and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Foulds v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Evans v. HunterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Will of Hinners v. HinnersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of LiellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cuppett v. NeillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
- In Matter of Trust of SensenbrennerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Church v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Estate of Short v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- Hood v. GarrettOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.