Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Merigold

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1935PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff’s decedent was killed in an automobile accident and the plaintiff brought this action alleging that his death was due to the negligence of the defendant. She pleaded that her intestate was in the exercise of due care, the defendant denied the paragraph of the complaint in which this is alleged, but did not affirmatively plead the decedent’s contributory negligence. The trial court in its charge instructed the jury that the burden of proof was upon the plaintiff and made no mention of the statute which provides as follows: “In any action to recover damages for negligently causing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Ferguson v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. L'Heureux v. HurleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Kotler v. LalleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Ryan v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Chase v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Leblanc v. GrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. McPheters v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Leitzes v. F. L. Caulkins Auto Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API