Legal Opinion

Leitzes v. F. L. Caulkins Auto Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 21, 1937PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

On June 4th, 1936, the defendant Lieberman was in the employ of the named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, as a salesman of new and second-hand automobiles. At about 5.45 p. m. that day, Lieberman drove the plaintiff and her two sisters, who were his cousins and had just finished their day’s work in a store on Main Street in Middle-town, to their home on Silver Street in the defendant’s caf. Thereupon the plaintiff alighted and as she stood nearby Lieberman backed the car over her foot, causing serious injury due solely to his negligence. These facts are undisputed, but by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Russell v. VergasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Hatch v. MerigoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. State v. PoplowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Roberti v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Morgan v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Koops v. GreggSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Craig v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  5. In the Matter of Gilhuly's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API