Legal Opinion

United States v. Cecil Ferguson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1993No. 91-6316PublishedCited by 295 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Cecil Ferguson appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress a firearm and evidence of drug trafficking found, following a traffic stop, in a car in which he was a passenger. Ferguson argues that the district court erred in finding that the traffic stop was not unlawfully pretextual and in not suppressing the evidence because of the unlawful stop. For the reasons discussed below, we adopt a new test in this Circuit for determining when a traffic stop should be deemed unlawfully pretextual. Applying this test to the stop of defendant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by295 opinions

  1. Sykes v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stemler v. City of FlorenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API