Legal Opinion
White v. Boucher
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 30, 1982No. 52026PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Timothy and Lori White sought specific performance of a land purchase contract against the vendors, Steven P. and Wanda Boucher. The Whites also named Christy Realty as a defendant. Christy Realty crossclaimed against Boucher for its real estate commission. Following a jury trial judgment for specific performance and damages were awarded to the Whites and Christy Realty was awarded its commission. We affirm the judgment in favor of the Whites, but reverse and remand for further proceedings the judgment in favor of Christy Realty.
On April 3, 1979, the Bouchers entered into a real…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Farrell v. ScoreWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Billington v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
- Burleson v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Vacura v. Haar's Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Hernandez v. Sulier (In re Sulier)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. San Antonio Cash NetworkDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Meahyen v. Meahyen (In Re Meahyen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.