Legal Opinion

Sovereign Bank v. Sturgis

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 22, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-10601-DPWPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiff Sovereign Bank (“Sovereign”) brought this action against Defendants Michael and Constance Sturgis to collect a deficiency allegedly due on several notes after Sovereign foreclosed on the properties securing the debts. The Sturgises responded with an array of fifteen counterclaims alleging various unlawful acts committed by Sovereign in the course of servicing the loans and foreclosing on the mortgages. Both parties have filed motions to dismiss the respective claims against them pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).

I. STANDARD OF…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Enora Perez v. Wdlls Fargo N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Foley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SchumacherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. O'Connor v. Nantucket BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  5. Harrington ex rel. Harrington v. City of AttleboroDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API