Legal Opinion

Porter v. Stanford

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1959No. 6910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Chief Justice.

The petitioners, Pearline Porter and Pauline P. Leonard, seek a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court and the Honorable R. C. Stanford, Jr., one of the judges thereof, from enforcing an order for the payment of support money to Gladys E. Porter from the assets of property which petitioners allege to be partnership property. Following informal hearing alternative writ issued.

The facts are that on February 13, 1959, Gladys E. Porter commenced an action for separate maintenance against her nonresident husband, William Arnold Porter, in the superior court of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Nichols v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Sawyer v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In the Matter of WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. William A. Porter v. W. Francis WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. Kemble v. StanfordArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Porter v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API