Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Wilson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1970No. 9536PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Justice:

Formal charges were filed by the Board of Governors against W. Francis Wilson— hereinafter referred to as Respondent— alleging that he had violated the Canons of Professional Ethics of an attorney at law, including Canons 11 and 22; also that he had violated Sec. 32-267, A.R.S.

Consideration of the questions involved by both the Bar and this Court are complicated by the unique situation which developed during and after the hearings on this matter by the Board of Governors and before final presentation to this Court. The charges grew out of the handling of the cases of two of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Kemble v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re Disbarment of MyrlandArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. In Re MacDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Hoover v. RonwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. In Re E. Gene Wade Joyzelle I. Wade, Debtors. E. Gene Wade Joyzelle I. Wade v. State Bar of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, LurieArizona Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API