Legal Opinion

Kemble v. Stanford

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1959No. 6911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Chief Justice.

The petitioner, George C. Kemble, seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court and the Honorable R. C. Stanford, Jr., one of the judges thereof, from enforcing one of its orders. This is a companion case to Cause No. 6910, Porter v. Stanford, — Ariz. —, 347 P.2d 35. The facts therein stated need not be repeated. Those stated in this case are intended to be supplementary in nature. The order which the petitioner, George C. Kemble, seeks to prohibit the superior court from enforcing is precisely the same as the one sought to be prohibited in the Porter case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Porter v. StanfordArizona Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In the Matter of WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. William A. Porter v. W. Francis WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Neely v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Porter v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API