Legal Opinion
A. J. Raisch Paving Co. v. Mountain View Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1972No. Civ. 29755PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
Defendant, Mountain View Savings and Loan Association (Savings and Loan), appeals a judgment after a court trial foreclosing a mechanic’s lien of plaintiff, A. J. Raisch Paving Company (Raisch) on tentative subdivision Tract 2634 owned by Savings and Loan in the City of Newark (City), in the amount of $16,068.15, with interest at 7 percent, together with costs of suit. Savings, and Loan contends that the claim of lien was not timely filed and even if so, the costs of the sewer on Robertson Avenue, that also benefited completed subdivision Tract 2633, must be apportioned.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Willamette Steam Mills Co. v. KremerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hendrickson v. BertelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Cox v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burton v. SosinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Rental Equipment, Inc. v. McDaniel Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re: El Dorado Improvement Corporation, Debtor. Sundt Corporation v. Dynamic Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Palomar Grading v. Wells FargoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- R&R Pipeline, Inc. v. Bond Safeguard InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014