Legal Opinion

In Re: El Dorado Improvement Corporation, Debtor. Sundt Corporation v. Dynamic Finance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2003No. 00-57066PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.

One commentator describes the frontier equivalent of mechanic’s hens:

If you furnish lumber to a man to build his house and he doesn’t pay you, you shoot him. If he sells the house and the new owner refuses to pay you, you shoot the new owner. 1

What this regime lacked in due process, it made up for in clarity, the importance of which is driven home by the somewhat opaque issue we tackle in this case: whether a South Lake Tahoe redevelopment project was “subject to acceptance by any public entity” under California’s mechanic’s hen law.

1. The redevelopment project…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gardner v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lewis v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Howard A. Deason & Co. v. Costa Tierra Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. DEPARTMENT OF INDUS. REL. v. Fidelity Roof Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Richards v. Hillside Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. R&R Pipeline, Inc. v. Bond Safeguard InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API