Legal Opinion

Borgonovo v. Henderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1960No. Civ. 18620PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This case arises out of the debacle left by an operator, who constructed and sold motels, and whose defaults have caused loss to those with whom he dealt. We fix only the division and participation of the losses among the innocents, a determination which must rest upon an application of the legal rules to the facts. Appellants appeal from a judgment which declares that respondent Pacific Commercial Builders is a holder in due course of their promissory note and that appellants have no right of setoff or recoupment against the note. We have concluded, however, that, since appellants deposited…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Osborn v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Rianda v. San Benito Title Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brawley v. J.C. Interiors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Linden Partners v. Wilshire Linden AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Kish v. Bay Counties Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Leiter v. EltingeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API