Legal Opinion

State v. Schirmer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1949No. 7525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

The respondents have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript was not served upon their attorney as required by section 19-2812, I.C. This section requires that the transcript be served by the attorney for appellant upon attorney for respondent within ten days after receiving copies thereof from the clerk, and that proof of service be filed with the clerk of the supreme court. After this motion was made, the proof of service was filed with the clerk of the supreme Court almost seven months after the service was made and after the cause was set for hearing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gustine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  3. People v. FiegelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. State v. . AddorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Clayton v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OttoIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. WebbIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Moerder v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. OttoIdaho Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API