Legal Opinion
Moerder v. City of Moscow
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1953No. 8016PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, Justice.
Claiming special damages to himself and as owner of a residence and other property in a zoned area in the City of Moscow, appellant brought this action to secure a writ of mandate to require the Mayor and City Officials of the City of Moscow to enforce a zoning ordinance designated in the petition as Sec. 4 — 902 Ordinances of the City of Moscow. This ordinance so far as pertinent reads:
“No building shall be erected within any residence zone of the City of Moscow, any portion of which is nearer the street line than the ‘Building Line’ as defined herein. The ‘Building Line’ on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sweaney & Smith Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Beem v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Clayton v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Bohannon Dredging Co. v. EnglandIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Clear Lake Power & Improvement Co. v. ChriswellIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- White v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Musser v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Saviers v. RicheyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Bistline v. EberleIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Moerder v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.