Legal Opinion

People v. Fiegelman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1939No. Crim. 522PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In separate informations filed by the district attorney of Kern County, the defendants and appellants were charged with attempted grand theft from the person of one A. F. Hitchcock. Appellant Fiegelman, in addition to the offense described, was also accused of and admitted two prior convictions of felonies. He served two separate terms thereunder in the state prison at San Quentin. After pleas of not guilty to the charge were regularly entered, the cases were consolidated for trial before a jury which returned verdicts of guilty. This appeal is prosecuted from the judgments of conviction and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. People v. KongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. In Re MagidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. MandelArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. United States v. Heng Awkak RomanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API