Legal Opinion
Pohrman v. KLAMATH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1975PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The Court of Appeals dismissed petitioner’s appeal because of a defect in the notice of appeal. We granted the petition for review.
Petitioner filed and duly served a timely notice of appeal. That service was made is not in issue. Petitioner did not “affix” or “endorse thereon” a proof of service until after the time for appeal had expired. The Court of Appeals held that because the proof of service was not on the notice as filed it had no jurisdiction. The court correctly interpreted Cooke v. Traver, 181 Or 643, 184 P2d 866 (1947); Knapp v. Olson, 214 Or 206, 328 P2d 772 (1958); and Stiehl v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Briney v. StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1876
- Muckle v. Columbia CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Millard v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Cooke v. TraverOregon Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Stahl v. KrasowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Murray Well-Drilling v. DeischCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Conn OrganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.