Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Traver

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUSK, Acting Chief Justice.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the notice of appeal given by the appellant does not comply with the statutory requirement that, after service of such notice on the adverse party or his attorney, “the original, with proof of service indorsed thereon”, shall be filed with the clerk of the court in which the judgment, order or decree is entered. The statute provides:

“If the appeal is not taken at the time the decision, order, judgment or decree is rendered or given, then the party desiring to appeal may cause a notice signed by himself…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barbre v. GoodaleOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Martin v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Casey v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Williams v. RaganOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Earle v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pohrman v. KLAMATH COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Meury v. JarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Stiehl v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Knapp v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hartman v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API