Legal Opinion

Millard v. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The respondents filed a motion to dismiss appellant’s appeal because appellant failed to include in his notice of appeal a designation of the portions of the proceeding to be included in the record and a statement of points on which the appellant intends to rely.

Prior to September 1971, ORS 19.074 provided:

“(2) At tbe time of filing the notice of appeal the appellant shall serve and file:
“(a) A designation of such parts of the proceedings and exhibits as he desires to be included in the record in addition to the trial court file.
“(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this subsection, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Stiehl v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stahl v. KrasowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pohrman v. KLAMATH COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Conn OrganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Peterson v. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LAKE OSWEGOCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API